I walked into the kitchen as Sparkly was about to sweep a pile of vegetable peelings from the work surface into the rubbish bin. They were backlit, dramatically, by a low, strong, bright bundle of the evening sun’s rays bursting through a high, small window. I stopped her mid-swipe. She knew from the look on my face what was coming next. Living with a photographer can be weird at times.
The first picture on this post is what I’d imagined the end result would be, but getting it right needed a little extra work. The contrast range of the fierce lighting was too great for my little point-and-shoot to handle unaided, and it’s exposure system was screaming in protest at having to decide which of the tones to lose, in order to make the best of what it was computing.
The second picture is what the camera gave, unaided, in such extreme lighting conditions. I dislike the lack of detail in the light tones: the parsnip skins have lost their texture. Gone is that subtle, cream colouring. The mid tones are OK, but the shadows have blocked up, gone black, dead. There is too much detail missing to please me.
Strong sunlight is harsh and cruel: that's why so many flower photos fail to please. Such brightly coloured, delicately textured subjects are usually best captured during cloudy, overcast days.
To get the most from these glowing parings, I needed to invent a miniature cloudy sky, and fast. A few moments later, with a roll of kitchen paper (just the ordinary, everyday stuff used to line cake tins) held up by my willing collaborator, and I’d got the shot I wanted for this blog.
The third snap shows the setup. It gives you an overview of the surroundings. It reveals how the sunlight was modified by the paper. You could say the original hard light source (meaning that which created hard-edged, dark shadows, with small, strong highlights) had been softened.
A soft light source generally results in shadows with more diffuse edges, lighter tones and smoother, broader highlights. If you were a fly on the sweet potato rind when the roll of paper was unfurled, you’d have thought that the sun had gone in behind a big, white cloud. That large area of much gentler light reduced the contrast range in the subject, giving the tiny camera a chance to accommodate the reduced number of tonal steps into it’s limited response.
Using cameras teaches us to see more clearly, but our eyes and brains are infinitely better at reproducing at our immediate surroundings than any optical machinery we have invented so far. That means, as photographers, if we are to materialise the images we first imagine in our mind’s eye, then we must learn to work within the limtations of the photographic process. So, the fourth shot in this series required the camera’s built-in flash. I almost always keep it turned off permanently, since I so love to explore what is possible using only available light, but in this instance I needed to pump extra illumination into the deep, dark shadows of that against-the-light scene, so that the camera could show you more of what was really going on.